��ժҪ��Ϣ

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

��Ƥ��Բ�ѧ��־ 2005, 31(2) 78-80 DOI: ISSN: 2096-5540 CN: 32-1880/R

��Ŀ¼ | ��Ŀ¼ | �� | �߼�� [��ӡ��ҳ] [�ر�]

��

	��չ��

	��Ϣ
	Supporting info
	PDFȫ��
	[HTMLȫ��]
	�ο��
	��뷴��
	�ѱ��Ƽ��
	��ҵ��
	��ù��
	��ñ��
	Email Alert
	��·��
	��Ϣ
	��Ĺؼ��
	��
	��Ƭ��
	�ٴ�Ӧ��
	��
	��÷
	�˺�
	PubMed
	Article by
	Article by

��鼰��ٴ�Ӧ��

��÷, �˺�

�й�ҽѧ��ѧԺ��й�Э��ҽ�ƴ�ѧƤ��о�� Ͼ� 210042

ժҪ��

��Ϲ��Ӧ��Ƥ�׺��ۻ��߹��Ե��Ҫ��,��ٴ��ϡ��Ʒ��淢��Ҫ��á��ͳһ��鷽��(��Ӧԭ��Դ��鲽��),��Ҫ��һ��淶��׼��,��ķ��ֱ�Ӧԭ��ڲ��ϱ仯��Ŀǰ��ı�Ӧԭ��ڹ��ء��ȡ��ʾ��ڹ��ı�Ӧԭ��Ҫ��ʱ��,�Ա�Ϊ�ٴ��ϡ��ṩȷ�е��ݡ�

�ؼ���� Ƭ�� ٴ�Ӧ��

Abstract:

Keywords:

�ո�� 2004-01-12 �޻�� ��淢��

DOI:

��Ŀ:

ͨѶ��:

��߼��:

�ο��ף�

[1] Neumann NJ, Lehmann P. The photopatch test procedure of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2003, 19:8-10.
[2] Neumann NJ,Holzle E,Plewig G, et al.Photopatch testing: the 12-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000,42:183-192.
[3] Photopatch testing-methods and indications. British Photodermatology Group. Br J Dermatol, 1997,136:371-376.
[4] Bell HK, Rhodes LE.Photopatch testing in photosensitive patients.Br J Dermatol,2000,142:589-590.
[5] Bakkum R, Heule F. Results of photopatch testing in Rotterdam during a 10-year period.Br J Dermatol, 2002, 146:275-279.
[6] Berne B, Ros AM. 7 years experience of photopatch testing with sunscreen allergens in Sweden. Contact Dermatitis,1998, 38:61-64.
[7] Schwarze HP, Albes B, Marguery MC, et al. Evaluation of drug-induced photosensitivity by UVB photopatch testing.Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 39:200.
[8] Pollock B, Wilkinson SM. Photopatch test method: influence of type of irradiation and value of day-7 reading. Contact Dermatitis, 2001, 44:270-272.
[9] DeLeo V, Gonzalez E, Kim J, et al.hototesting and photopatch testing: when to do it and when not to do it. Am J Contact Dermat, 2000, 11:57-61.
[10] Hasan T, Jansen CT. Photopatch test reactivity: effect of photoallergen concentration and UVA dosaging.Contact Dermatitis, 1996, 34:383-386.
[11] Darvay A, White IR, Rycroft RJ, et al. Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon. Br J Dermatol, 2001, 145:597-601.
[12] Boonstra HE, van Weelden H, Toonstra J, et al Polymorphous light eruption: A clinical, photobiologic, and follow-up study of 110 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000, 42:199-207.
[13] Crouch RB, Foley PA, Baker CS. Analysis of patients with suspected photosensitivity referred for investigation to an Australian photodermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2003, 48:714-720.
[14] Lim HW, Cohen D, Soter NA. Chronic actinic dermatitis: results of patch and photopatch tests with Compositae, fragrances, and pesticides. J Am Acad Dermatol,1998, 38:108-111.
[15] Lee AY, Jung SY. Two patients with isoniazid-induced photosensitive lichenoid eruptions confirmed by photopatch test. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed,1998, 14:77-78.
[16] Morimoto K, Kawada A, Hiruma M, et al. Photosensitivity to simvastatin with an unusual response to photopatch and photo tests. Contact Dermatitis, 1995, 33:274.
[17] Sandra A, Srinivas CR, Deshpande SC. Photopatch test reaction to amitriptyline. Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 39:208-209.
[18] Matsushita T, Kamide R. Five cases of photocontact dermatitis due to topical ketoprofen: photopatch testing and cross-reaction study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2001,17:26-31.
[19] Durbize E, Vigan M, Puzenat E,et al. Spectrum of cross-photosensitization in 18 consecutive patients with contact photoallergy to ketoprofen: associated photoallergies to non-benzophenone-containing molecules. Contact Dermatitis, 2003, 48:144-149.